Přejít k hlavnímu obsahu

Přihlášení pro studenty

Přihlášení pro zaměstnance

Publikace detail

Risks Associated with Evaluation of Regional Disparity: The Influence of Metropolitan Areas on Results in Visegrad Group Countries
Autoři: Zdražil Pavel | Reifová Lenka
Rok: 2018
Druh publikace: článek ve sborníku
Název zdroje: Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific Conference ‘Public Administration 2018’
Název nakladatele: Univerzita Pardubice
Místo vydání: Pardubice
Strana od-do: 216-226
Tituly:
Jazyk Název Abstrakt Klíčová slova
cze Rizika spojená s hodnocením regionálních disparit: Vliv metropolitních oblastí na výsledky měření v zemích Visegradské skupiny Příspěvek se zaměřuje na rizika spojená s hodnocením regionálních disparit, která demonstruje na vlivu metropolitních oblastí v zemích Visegradské skupiny. Cílem příspěvku je zhodnotit vliv metropolitních oblastí na vývoj naměřených regionálních disparit v zemích Visegradské skupiny. měření disparit; metropolitní oblasti; Visegradská skupina; regionální rozvoj; regionální politika
eng Risks Associated with Evaluation of Regional Disparity: The Influence of Metropolitan Areas on Results in Visegrad Group Countries The aim of this paper is to evaluate the influence of metropolitan areas on the development of regional disparity results in Visegrad Group countries. The methodological framework is based on the neoclassical growth model. In particular, the approaches of beta- and sigma convergence have been used to examine the development of regional disparity between 2000 and 2016. The analysis results suggest that the influence of metropolitan areas on the results of regional disparity is large in many fields of development like: GDP, income, unemployment, education and expenditures on research and development. In fact, inclusion, or exclusion, of metropolitan area is very often the decisive reason for considering the convergence, or divergence, process to be statistically significant. However, the metropolitan areas do not bias only the results about tendency. The analysis suggests they are much more important in terms of intensity of particular processes. The results of intensity differ by hundreds of percent between the samples with and without the metropolitan areas. On the other hand, the results have been usually biased only in terms of intensity and significance. In general, the effect of metropolitan areas in Visegrad Group countries is not strong enough to change the results from convergence to divergence, and vice-versa. disparity measurement; metropolitan areas; Visegrad Group; regional development; regional policy